Presumably, there are countless tasks that an omnipotent, all-powerful, being could perform, that we, non-omnipotent creatures (strong as we may be), could not, if such a being could exist. Moreover, given our standards of what we take to be logical limits on what is possible and what is not, it might be argued that among the tasks performable by an all-powerful being are included some that we might judge to be seemingly impossible. Yet clarity demands some notion of logical possibility as the limit, even for omnipotent performances. What I would like to explore in this brief piece is the concept of a supertask, which is to be understood as a task that only an omnipotent being could perform.
The notion of a task is a helpful one, I submit, since it connotes an activity
with an achievement, or terminus---an outcome or successful completion; in other words, a
process of means to an accomplished end. Further, a task lends itself to a procedural
explication popular in the terminology of logic and computational theory; viz., a flow-chart,
or a general set of instructions which indicate, sequentially, just how the task can be
performed to completion. From start to finish, there is precision, understanding, and
theoretical description offered by a flow-chart, which characterizes a program of
calculation. Now consider the following chart, which defines a particular task involving
one's listing of natural numbers in series: 1, 2, 3, 4, and so on. We can then go on to
discuss features of the task with regard to omnipotence, aided by the flow-chart.
QUESTION: Is the above a possible supertask? Or: Is it logically possible for any being to successfully run the program described by the flow-chart? Or: Is an omnipotent being possible? Think about this....
Submit your reasoned case to Dr. Ron
Barnette
(Special thanks to Emily Gung for preparing the original HTML version)