HISTORY
4207/6207
United States Foreign Relations to 1921
Instructor: Professor Charles Johnson Class Meeting: TTh 12:30-1:45
Office: 202 North Ashley Hall Office Hours: M
8:30-11:30
Phone: 333-5947 Email: ctjohnso@valdosta.edu
COURSE
DESCRIPTION
This course explores the
diplomatic relations between the United States and the world from the mid 18th
century to 1921. We will examine such
themes as the foundations of United States foreign policy, its ideology and the
transition of the nation from a struggling federation of states to the status
of world power. The class will
culminate with an intensive reexamination of World War One, including its
origins, United States involvement and the war's impact on future events.
TEXTBOOKS
The following books are required
and available in the campus bookstore.
Lloyd Ambrosius. Wilsonian Statecraft: Theory and Practice of Liberal
Internationalism During World War I. Scholarly
Resources , 19991.
Niall Ferguson. The Pity of War:
Explaining World War I. Basic
Books, 1999.
Thomas Paterson, ed. Major
Problems in American Foreign Policy:
Vol. I to 1920 (5th edition).
Houghton-Mifflin, 1999.
EVALUATION
Your final grade will be
determined by the following factors:
700 Précis for articles in Major
Problems (100pts each)
100
Book
Review Essay Pity of War
100
Book Review Essay Wilsonian Statecraft
200
Participation
GROUND RULES
1.
No
late papers will be accepted for any reason.
If you turn in a paper outside of class or late I will only give you a
"CR", but will not assign any points.
2.
In
order to be eligible to pass this course you must complete and turn in ALL the
assignments. Failure to do so will
result in, at best, an "I" or, at worst, an "F" for a final
grade.
3.
You
are allowed only ONE absence for the semester.
After that I will begin deducting 30 points for each absence.
4.
Repeated
tardiness will result in a 15 point deduction for each incident.
WEEKLY SCHEDULE
Week
One: 8/16 to 8/18 (Wed-Fri)
Course Introduction
"Foundations of American
Foreign Policy"
Week
Two: 8/21 to 8/25
Ideology and American Foreign
Relations
Readings: Perkins (2), Williams (8) and Hunt (14)
Week Three: 8/28 to 9/1
The Diplomacy of Revolution,
1770-1783
Readings: Kaplan (46) and Onuf (53)
Précis due on
Thursday
Week
Four: 9/4 to 9/8
The Federalist Era, 1783-1801
Readings: Tucker (77) and Kaplan (85)
Précis due on
Thursday
Week
Five: 9/11 to 9/15
Continental Expansion,
1801-1812
Readings: Tucker (105) and DeConde (115)
Précis due on
Thursday
Week
Six: 9/18 to 9/22
The War of 1812
Readings: Perkins (138), Watts (148) and Stuart (158)
Précis on
Perkins and Watts or Stuart due on Thursday
Week
Seven: 9/25 to 9/29
The Monroe Doctrine,
1817-1845
Readings: The Monroe Doctrine (170), Perkins (174) and
May (183)
Précis on
Perkins and May due on Thursday
Week
Eight: 10/2 to 10/6
Manifest Destiny, War With
Mexico and Sectional Crisis, 1845-1865
Readings: Stephanson (241) and Pletcher (253)
Précis due on Thursday
Week
Nine: 10/9 to 10/13
An Emerging World Power,
1865-1895
Readings: Harris (297), Kennedy (321) and Pletcher (335)
Précis on Harris
and Pletcher due on Thursday
Week
Ten: 10/ 16 to 10/20
Imperial Democracy, 1895-1900
Readings: LaFeber (357), Perez (373) and Rydell (411)
Précis on Perez
and Rydell due on Thursday
Week
Eleven: 10/23 to 10/27
America as World Power,
1901-1914
Readings: Hunt (429), LaFeber (469) and Bederman (477)
Précis on Hunt
and Bederman due on Thursday
Week
Twelve: 10/30 to 11/3
No Class Meetings
Week
Thirteen: 11/ 6 to 11/10
No Class Meetings
Week
Fourteen: 11/13 to 11/17
The Pity of War--Reinterpreting
World War One
Book Review
Essay Due on Tuesday
Week
Fifteen: 11/20 to 11/24
Thanksgiving Holiday
Week
Sixteen: 11/27 to 12/1
Wilsonian Statecraft--The
U.S. and the Great War: A Reassessment
Book Review
Essay Due on Tuesday
Week
Seventeen: 12/4 to 12/6 (Monday to
Wednesday)
Course Summation
All papers handed in MUST adhere to the
following style criteria. Five points will be deducted for each rule not
followed
1.
Typed (including your name)
2.
Double-space
3.
Stapled
4.
Margins:
Left—1 ½”; Top, Bottom and Right—1”.
Font: 12 pt. Courier; 12 pt. New
Times Roman; 12 pt. CG Times .
5.
All citations and bibliographic entries
must adhere to the guidelines set forth in the Chicago Manual of Style
or Turabian's A Manual for Writers.
UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES are you to use APA, MLA or any other format.
6.
In grading your papers I will also deduct
points for the following errors:
7.
Any student found plagiarizing an
assignment will receive an automatic "F" for the course.
PRÉCIS
INSTRUCTIONS FOR ESSAYS IN PATERSON TEXT
During weeks
3-11 you are required to write a précis for each article assigned that
week. Each summation should be roughly
3 pages in length. The purpose of this
assignment is to prepare you for class discussion. On the cover page include your name and the author/title of each
article. Each précis should include the
following:
1. A summary of the author’s thesis
2. A synopsis of the major points made by the author
3. Any bias on the part of the author
4. A summation of the author’s conclusions
5. Your opinion of the work (elaborate on this and tell me why
you feel the way you do about the work)
6. ONE question to ask the class that compares the two articles
INSTRUCTIONS FOR BOOK REVIEW ESSAYS
Listed
below are the instructions for your book review essays. The length of your review should be a
MINIMUM of six pages. It must also
adhere to the basic structural guidelines
which govern the writing of all papers for this class. In writing your essay you should address the
following in the order presented:
1.
In
the first few paragraphs of the paper indicate the general scope and topics
covered in the book. Do not give a
detailed summary of each chapter.
2.
Next
comment on the extent and depth of the research, the types of source materials
used and the method—traditional or unusual—utilized by the author. Here you can get help by looking at the
book’s footnotes/endnotes (if any) and the bibliography. Give examples from the book in explaining
your analysis.
3.
A
work of history is also a piece of literature; and it should be interestingly
and skillfully written. Assess the
strength and weakness—again, using examples—of this aspect.
4.
After
reading the book, go back into it and think it through, and find the overall
message or thesis of the author. See if
you can restate it in a sentence or two.
A well-written book will often have a unified theme explicitly stated;
but in some books, the theme or interpretation may be only implicit, so that
the reader must identify it by careful synthesis and logic.
5.
Now
evaluate the above interpretation or theme.
Is it convincing? Is it
supported with adequate evidence? Do
conclusions build upon the information, which has been supplied? Though you may feel “unqualified” to make
these judgments, you can still evaluate the book based upon your reading of it
as a piece of history. Remember that
all books have both strengths and weaknesses.
If you do not find both then you have not really read and analyzed the
book.
6.
For The
Pity of War answer the following in detail:
Why
is Ferguson's interpretation of World War One "radical"? If such a vision would have become of
reality, what type of world would have been created after WWI?
For
Wilsonian Statecraft answer the following in detail:
Was
the Wilsonian "world vision" a radical vision? If such a vision would have become a reality
what type of world would have created after WWI
7.
Find
three book reviews and comment on what
the reviewer thought of the book. Was
he/she critical of the work in a positive way?
In a negative way? Do you agree or disagree with the reviewers
comments? BE SURE TO INCLUDE
PHOTOCOPIES OF THE BOOK REVIEW WITH YOUR PAPER.
Finally, some thoughts for this
semester’s journey
“Our country! In her intercourse with foreign nations may she always be
in the right; but our country, right or
wrong.”
Stephen Decatur (1816)
“Diplomacy is to do and say the nastiest
thing in the nicest way.”
Isaac Goldberg
“The great questions of the time are not
decided by speeches and
majority decisions--that was the error of
1848 and 1849--but
by iron and blood.”
Otto von Bismarck (1862)