
|Innovative Cataloging|concept|relationship|charateristic|
The second map type is less common. It maps the hypertext links from and to the pages on the site. It can tell a very different story than the folder map. Rather than mapping the placement of general concepts, it shows the interconnections created by the Web author between and among specific ideas. For example, a folder map may identify the "location" within the site of a bibliography but the link map connects to specific citations within that bibliography.
Both of these are important. For this site, the bibliography is placed
at the top level. It is housed in the top folder. That may indicate that
the author feels that the bibliography is either all site inclusive or
that it is particularly important as a site tool. There are also links
from various pages to specific citations within the bibliography. These
links give no indication of the "general" importance of the bibliography
per
se, but are testimony to the importance of the specific reference.
Note that for the degrees of separation concept to work, you don't have to know the next contact well or even like him or her. By some rules, having met that person once is enough.
The WWW can also be classified according to degrees or separation. It is estimated that Web pages are separated by no more than nineteen "clicks of separation" (see http://www.seattlep-i.com/local/clik07.shtml). Distance is ambiguous in cyberspace. We could measure the physical distance (kilometers or "klicks"). But that means little. We can measure "clicks" or the minimum number of hypertext links required to move from page A to page B.
I suggest we can also measure "cliques." By that I mean, how are Web pages or Web sites clustered with each other. Re-examine the site map for this course. Is there any degree of "cliquishness" or similarity of subject matter by which the site is organized?
Following this logic, the concept of degrees of separation grows more complex. "I know someone who knows someone" is a legitimate as "I know an old woman who swallowed a frog...." It suggests that any associational process is a legitimate organizing principle and that distances between those concepts can be captured and used for information classification and retrieval.
"As a leading Internet search engine and the developer of the world's first research engine, our modest ambition, according to our CEO, David Seuss, is 'to index and classify all human knowledge to a unified consistent standard and make it available to everyone in the world in a single integrated search.'" [cite]If they were to succeed, Northernlight would become the index to World Brain, that global encyclopedia first envisaged by H.G. Wells in 1938.
Northernlight does several things other search engines do not. First, they provide access not only to Web documents but also to their Special Collection of digitized articles and reports. This latter group is provided on a fee paid basis. Their second innovation is the folders. NorthernLight categorizes the return set from a search into folders. These folders are relevance arranged according to hit set subject, type, source, and language. [cite]
Classification by concept is not new. What if I said to you "I'm feeling
blue." Does that mean I'm a Druid? Or, I'm depressed. Or I'm suffering
from inadequate oxygenation? Or that I'm reaching for the sky? In order
to understand the phrase "I'm feeling blue" additional context is needed.
KWIC (key word in context) is one way to provide the context. Capture terms
surrounding the target term and perhaps meaning will emerge. That often
works but is by no means perfect. "When I feel blue [depressed] I go outside
because when I feel blue [the sky] I'm in the pink. But when skies are
gray I cannot breathe and I feel blue [hypoxia]." Go forth and mix that
metaphor.
WAVE is not the only conceptual browser proposed, considered, evaluated, accepted or rejected. See, for example:
Cooperative Agents for Conceptual Search and Browsing of World Wide Web Resources: Local Characterizing Agent Available: http://homer.ittc.ukans.edu/website/agents/lca/architecture.html.
The points to understand here is that (1) most search and retrieval
systems are based on traditional methodologies, (2) technology permits
us to easily extend that knowledge to practical applications, (3) but real
innovation may come in the way the information is presented and interpreted.
We've come a long way from the card catalog in just over a decade. And,
it's not over yet.
|Innovative Cataloging|concept|relationship|charateristic|