|
|
ESOL 4020IA/6020IA:
Cultural Perspectives for ESOL Teachers
Summer II
2008
June 11-July 29
WEB ONLY
3 semester hours
Dr. Lee Campbell
Department of English
College of Arts and Sciences
Valdosta State University
Valdosta GA 31698-0025
Email:
jlcampbe@valdosta.edu
Web:
http://www.valdosta.edu/~jlcampbe
Read this syllabus especially
carefully:
this is a course designed for candidates seeking the ESOL endorsement;
as such, candidates must meet the ESOL program standards in order to pass
the course.
1. DESCRIPTION: Culture and the relationships between culture,
language, and education. Prospective ESOL teachers will investigate
theories related to the nature and role of culture and cultural groups in
the construction of learning environments that support linguistically
diverse learners. The course will address developmental aspects of
language and literacy with emphasis upon specific ways in which cultural
identities affect language learning and school achievement. This
course is designed for ESOL endorsement candidates.
2. TESOL STANDARDS: This course is one of three courses
required
for teachers or prospective teachers who want to add the English to
Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) endorsement to their teaching certificates.
ESOL 4020/6020 addresses the following standards for PK-12
teaching education in ESOL established by TESOL and Georgia's Professional
Standards Commission:
- DOMAIN 1: LANGUAGE - Candidates know, understand, and use the major
concepts, theories, and research related to the nature and acquisition
of language to construct learning environments that support ESOL
students' language and literacy development and content area
achievement.
- DOMAIN 2: CULTURE - Candidates know, understand, and use the major
concepts, theories, and research related to the nature and structure of
culture to construct learning environments that support ESOL students'
language and literacy development and content area achievement.
- STANDARD 2A NATURE AND ROLE OF CULTURE - Candidates know,
understand, and use the major concepts, principles, theories, and
research related to the nature and role of culture in language
development and academic achievement that support individual students'
learning.
- STANDARD 2B CULTURAL GROUPS AND IDENTITY - Candidates know,
understand, and use knowledge of how cultural groups and students'
cultural identities affect language learning and school achievement.
3. CONCEPTUAL STANDARDS: ESOL 4020/6020 is
taught in accordance with the College of Education's conceptual framework
standards (CFS):
-
I. CONTENT AND
CURRICULUM: Teachers demonstrate a strong content knowledge of content
area(s) that are appropriate for their certification levels.
-
II. KNOWLEDGE
OF STUDENTS AND THEIR LEARNING: Teachers support the intellectual,
social, physical, and personal development of all students.
-
III. LEARNING
ENVIRONMENTS: Teachers create learning environments that encourage
positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and
self-motivation.
-
IV. ASSESSMENT: Teachers understand and use a range of formal and
informal assessment strategies to evaluate and ensure the continuous
development of all learners.
-
V. PLANNING AND INSTRUCTION: Teachers design and create instructional
experiences based on their knowledge of content and curriculum,
students, learning environments, and assessment.
-
VI.
PROFESSIONALISM: Teachers recognize, participate in, and contribute to
teaching as a profession.
4. PRINCIPLES: ESOL 4020/6020 is taught in
accordance with the following guiding principles of Georgia teacher
education programs:
-
Dispositions
Principle: Productive dispositions positively affect learners,
professional growth, and the learning environment.
-
Equity
Principle: All learners deserve high expectations and support.
-
Process
Principle: Learning is a lifelong process of development and growth.
-
Ownership
Principle: Professionals are committed to, and assume responsibility
for, the future of their disciplines.
-
Support
Principle: Successful engagement in the process of learning requires
collaboration among multiple partners.
-
Impact
Principle: Effective practice yields evidence of learning.
-
Technology
Principle: Technology facilitates teaching, learning,
community-building, and resource acquisition
-
Standards
Principle: Evidence-based standards systematically guide professional
preparation and development.
The study of linguistics and applied linguistics--and especially the study
of language diversity--has historically been highly sensitive to the role
of teacher disposition in language learning. Linguistics strongly
advocates an objective approach to language free from preconceptions and
prejudice.
5.
OUTCOMES: Students in ESOL 4020/6020 will meet the following target outcomes:
- 1. Demonstrate an understanding of ways in which cultural groups and
students' cultural identities affect language learning and school
achievement (CFS II, III, IV, V).
- 2. Demonstrate an understanding of
ways in which role expectations and other social variables such as age,
gender, social class, religion, ethnicity, and place of residence affect
the way people speak and behave (CFS I, II, III, IV, V).
- 3. Demonstrate an understanding of the relationship between
culturally conditioned interaction patterns and effective communication
and teaching (CFS I, II)
- 4. Demonstrate an understanding of of the
relationship between situational variables and convention and human
behavior (CFS I, II, III)
- 5. Apply strategies for identifying,
analyzing, and comparing cultures (CFS I, II, IV).
- 6. Demonstrate an
understanding of ways to cultivate curiosity about other cultures (CFS
I, II, III, V, VI).
- 7. Collaborate with local teachers, students, and
parents involved in ESOL programs (CFS VI).
- 8. Demonstrate an ability
to develop and utilize activities that promote understanding of L1 and
L2 cultures (CFS II, III, IV, V, VI).
6. TEXTS, ONLINE CONTEXT: Three textbooks are required:
- Language, Culture, and Communication: The Meaning of Messages,
5/e, by
Nancy Bonvillain (Pearson Prentice Hall, 2008: ISBN
0-13-513568-0)--abbreviated
here by B
- Not for ESOL Teachers: What Every Classroom Teacher Needs to Know
about the Linguistically, Culturally, and Ethnically Diverse Student,
by Eileen N. Whelan Ariza (Pearson, 2006: ISBN 0-205-38690-3)--abbreviated here by A
- Con Respeto: Bridging the
Distances Between Culturally Diverse Families and Schools, 1/e,
by Guadalupe Valdes (Teachers College Press, 1996: ISBN 0-8077-3526-4)--abbreviated here by V
In addition, students will be asked to read three articles from the
Bilingual Research Journal in order to familiarize themselves with
qualitative--case study--research.
It's crucial that students get the texts ASAP. They can be obtained
at VSU's bookstore and various sites all over the web. No special
dispensations can be given students who for whatever reason cannot obtain
texts quickly.
- Students will need the computing requisites to handle WebCT Vista.
Check the FAQ at the log in page if you are having typical problems
posting material, maintaining a connection, and so forth. The instructor gets by on a shoestring of knowledge with respect to technology: he is not
the one to contact concerning technical problems. Get help through
the online help forms or call the help desk.
- Students will need an email account to communicate with the
instructor outside WebCT. The instructor is teaching from home this
summer, so don't call the Department of English at VSU or mail anything
to the instructor's office at VSU. For email, use the
instructor's regular Blazenet email listed at the top of this syllabus:
don't use the WebCT mail, which I often forget to check.
- If a student needs to communicate with the instructor via the spoken
word, ask for the instructor's home phone number and a call will be
scheduled.
- The instructor will establish an open discussion area for
problems, questions, announcements, discoveries, hallelujahs, and so on.
Help each other out and keep an eye out for announcements.
- There are at least two challenges for students enrolled in Summer II
4020/6020: this is an online course and it last seven weeks.
Students will need to police themselves carefully to keep up with the
fast-moving schedule.
- Remember that the syllabus is posted on the World Wide Web; to check
something on it or follow links, you don't have to log into WebCT.
- Here's a tip that can save you heartache: when you write anything
for this class, type it up on some word processing program and save it
often to a disk or wherever. Don't type anything directly onto
WebCT, which then may be lost if the power goes out or your computer
freezes. Use your favorite word processing program and then copy
and paste your writings or attach them. The instructor will undoubtedly
ignore this advice at times and regret it.
7. ASSIGNMENTS: Because of the short seven-week summer
term, this course will focus on the application of major concepts language and
culture to a
written project--a case study--developed by each student.
Students will
- write a proposal for their case
study (10 points)
- write a progress report for
their case study (5 points)
- write a final report of their
case study (50 points: see rubric below): case study assignments address
outcomes 1-8.
- lead one focused discussion of one chapter from A or V
(5 points): addresses outcome 6
- participate in at least 10 focused discussions of chapters from A or
V (10 points): addresses outcomes 6, 8
- complete reading quizzes on B (8 quizzes at 2.5 points each:
20
points total): addresses outcomes 1-5
Students must complete assignments 1, 2, and
3 to earn at least a C in the course.
8. GRADING: Grades will be
figured according to a 5-point GPA-like system in which 5=A+, 4.5=A-,
4=B, 3.5=B-, 3=C, 2.5=C-, 2=D, 1.5=D-, 1=F, and 0=not attempted.
Thus, for an assignment
worth 10 points, 10=A+, 9=A-, 8=B, and so on. For assignment
worth 50 points, 50=A+, 45=A-, 40=B, 35=B-, etc., and for
an assignment worth 15 points, 15=A+,
13.5=A-, 12=B, 10.5=B-, 9=C, and so forth. There are 100 possible points
in the class. Final grades will be
determined by the following scale:
- 100/100 = A+
- approximately 90 = A-
- 80/100 = B
- 70/100 = B-
- 60/100 = C
- 50/100 = C-
- 40/100 = D
- below 40 = F
In terms of final grades, then, members wanting an A need
about 90 points (the instructor will go a little below 90). To earn a B, a member needs
70; a C, 50.
9. GRADUATE STUDENTS: Graduate students
- must write a final report of their case study
that is at the long end of the suggested page range (or over),
- incorporate references to
all three textbooks,
- and cite at least three other relevant secondary sources.
10. SPECIAL SERVICES: Class members requiring accommodations or modifications because of a documented disability
should discuss this need with the instructor at the beginning of the
term. Class members who require assistance but who are not
registered with the Special Services Program should contact VSU's Access Office.
11. APPLIED LINGUISTICS ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB AND GALILEO: The
WWW offers a number of useful resources for students of linguistics and
English language teaching. The instructor's homepage lists some
potentially helpful links that have come to his attention. Galileo,
of course, is the place to go for academic articles on applied
linguistics. Start with an easy full-text search in JSTOR, for
example. The very useful Bilingual Research Journal is
available on the regular WWW at <http://brj.asu.edu/>.
12. THE THINKING THIS COURSE ASKS YOU TO DO: And now for the
actual content of this course, which is a particular kind of thinking it
asks you to do. In brief, this course asks you to engage in
sociolinguistic thinking, which concerns relating situational, social, and
cultural variables (see Bonvillain 1) to linguistic behavior. I'd
also add relevant psychological variables, so that's why my shorthand is
psycho-sociocultural variables. Specifically, the course asks
you to relate these variables to the linguistic behavior of an English
language learner (ELL).
For example, silence and
hesitant, halting speech (linguistic variables) are not necessarily sure
indicators of low English proficiency:
- a wide range of psycho-sociocultural
variables might cause such speech, such as depression (the immigrant
experience is often stressful and depressing for many reasons)
- the
perceived speech situation in which the silence or hesitancy is exhibited
can inhibit expression,
including the relationship of the speakers, the subject matter, or the
genre (the instructor is no joke teller, so he's silent when people start
trading jokes)
- culturally conditioned interpretations of the
situation may reinforce silence (i.e., silence and lowered eyes might be the culturally
appropriate response for a given speaker).
This is the cognitive
goal of the course: train students to think about the relationship between
linguistic variables and psycho-sociocultural variables.
13. CASE STUDY, PROPOSAL, PROGRESS REPORT:
Students will demonstrate the thinking described in the previous section
when they write their case study of an ELL. In general terms, a case study is a kind of
qualitative (as opposed to quantitative) descriptive (as opposed to
experimental) research. A researcher chooses a human subject (an
English language learner, for this course) and describes that
person in terms of a number of variables that the researcher has reason
to suspect are crucial. Click here for a
guide to the case study assignment.
Candidates for the ESOL
endorsement must choose a PK-12 English language learner. The proposal
for the case study won't be approved if a candidate does not satisfy this requirement. Evidence
for endorsement candidates' appropriate field experience must be provided
to accrediting agencies.
Candidates must also supply the instructor with
an electronic version of the case study (posted to WebCT), which will be
assessed in LiveText. Because the instructor can't assess a hard
copy in LiveText, he must have an electronic copy. This requirement
shouldn't be problem in this online section.
So the first step in the case study is to get access to an ELL. Begin the search for a subject immediately.
Contact elementary, middle, or high schools in your area in order to tutor
a student or just engage in conversational English. Local migrant
programs are also a possibility. Your contact with a PK-12 ELL does
not have to take place in an educational setting as long as the subject is
of the appropriate age.
The second step is to define why you are interested in the subject.
Imagine, for example, that you're a teacher at an elementary school who
had a new migrant child assigned to your class late this last spring. You noticed after the first few days how
socially isolated the child was, perhaps because the child speaks Kanjobal, not
Spanish, perhaps because of very limited formal schooling, or none at all,
perhaps because she's a girl and has stayed home with her mother
most of her life. The teacher interested in doing a case
study on the child might hypothesize something about the relationship
of social isolation and lack of prior formal schooling to initial English language development and gather data
on the child through a variety of means (written work--if the child is literate, drawings,
observations, conversations, interviews, etc.) over a period of a few
weeks at one of the migrant education summer programs. How does the child become less socially isolated (or
why does she fail to),
how does the lessening social isolation or its maintenance affect
English language development, and what are the peculiar challenges for the
speaker of a minority Mexican language? Those are the kinds of questions a
case study attempts to investigate. Members will write up a proposal
for the case study summarizing their interests in a subject.
In outline form,
- students will produce case studies that account a wide range of linguistic variables in language use and
acquisition, such as
- accent, lexicon, register, style, conversational
strategies, paralanguage, bilingualism and code-switching, and standard and
nonstandard varieties. When appropriate, for example, students
will
- recognize and analyze socially significant linguistic
variables/markers and their role in group identification/solidarity
- interpret the significance of register and style choices
as they are influenced by culturally conditioned perceptions of
situations
- analyze conversation turns and parts and interpret with
reference to politeness strategies and face
- demonstrate an awareness of paralinguistic features and
the significance of these in cross-cultural communication
- recognize the value of L1 use and code-switching and
integral and inevitable parts of L2 acquisition, particularly when
literacy is not established in the L1
- demonstrate an understanding of additive versus
subtractive bilingualism
- students will produce case studies take into
account a wide range of situational and psycho-sociocultural variables in language use
and acquisition, such as
- place of origin, situation, socioeconomic class and
exposure to formal education and First World expectations concerning education,
literacy in L1, learning strategies and styles, ethnicity and culture,
family history, age, gender, movement between Third and First Worlds,
kind of immigrant experience (voluntary or involuntary), quality of L1 and L2
language communities, teachers and classrooms, and sociopolitical variables as they affect the
classroom, school, and community. When appropriate, students will
- recognize
and analyze psycho-sociocultural variables related to linguistic
variables and interpret them in terms of solidarity, accommodation,
prestige, power, and so on
- take into account
different cognitive demands of conversational versus academic language
- analyze
differences in exposure to formal schooling and expectations about it
without blaming children or parents for different perceptions or
attributing differences to a "deficit"
- recognize
and support individual learning strategies and styles
- recognize
and affirm manifestations of ethnicity and culture
- demonstrate
an understanding of different age- and gender-related linguistic
behaviors
- demonstrate
an understanding of English language learning within the context of
the immigrant experience, which includes
- cultures in
contact
- changing
cultural identities through the generations
- individuals'
negotiation of their cultural identities
- prejudice
- changing
language policies
- students will develop ways in which openness toward, curiosity
about, and an understanding of the ELL's culture might be encouraged in
the classroom
14. LEADING AND PARTICIPATING IN FOCUSED DISCUSSIONS: Outcomes
I, III, V, VI, and VIII all explicitly concern teaching ELLs. The
instructor wants the online discussions of A and V to
concentrate on pedagogical implications of those books. Leading a
focused discussion means selecting an issue or topic or two from a chapter
and framing questions about them for discussion. The leader starts
the discussion with a question or two and then responds several times to
contributions, keeping the discussion on track and developing further
relevant threads.
To lead a discussion, simply create the first message and post it.
The first person to post leads the discussion. Everyone needs to
lead one discussion. There should be 27 chapters from A and
V to choose from. The instructor will lead for A 1 and
V Preface and Introduction. Everyone needs to participate in
at least 10 discussions besides the one led. Participating in a
discussion means posting at least one substantive message or reply of some
length. Participate in at least one discussion during the eight
modules covering A and V and then participate in two a
couple of times.
Please spread the participation around: check discussions and
contribute to the one that needs some contributions. Don't everyone
pile on one.
Also, please watch your electronic etiquette. Try not to let your
emotions get the best of you.
15. SCHEDULE OF MODULES: The course is organized as a series of
ten
modules that involve readings, quizzes, discussions, and written assignments. Modules
must be done in order and on time. Again, the
Bonvillain text is abbreviated B, the Ariza book A, and the Valdes book V.
- Module 1
- Module 2
- Read B 1-2
- Read A 1-5
- Read V Preface and Introduction
- Take quiz on B 1-2
- Lead a discussion of A 2, 3, 4, or 5
- Participate in a discussion of A 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5
(instructor will lead discussion of A 1) or V Preface
and Introduction (instructor will lead that discussion)
- Post initial questions or ideas about case study
- Complete by June 23
- Module 3
- Read B 3
- Read A 6-10
- Read V 1
- Take quiz on B 3
- Lead a discussion of A 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 or V 1
- Participate in a discussion of A 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 or V
1
- Post proposal for case study
- Complete by June 30
- Module 4
- Read B 4-5
- Read A 11-12
- Read V 2-3
- Take a quiz on B 4-5
- Lead a discussion of A 11 or 12 or V 2 or 3
- Participate in a discussion of A 11 or 12 or V 2 or
3
- Complete by July 7
- Module 5
- Read B 6
- Read A 13-14
- Read V 4-5
- Take quiz on B 6
- Lead a discussion of A 13 or 14 or V 4 or 5
- Participate in a discussion of A 13 or 14 or V 4 or
5
- Complete by July 11
- Module 6
- Read B 7-8
- Read A 15-16
- Read V 6
- Take a quiz on B 7-8
- Lead a discussion of A 15 or 16 or V 6
- Participate in a discussion of A 15 or 16 or V 6
- Complete by July 16
- Module 7
- Read B 9
- Read A 17-19
- Read V 7
- Take a quiz on B 9
- Lead a discussion of A 17, 18, or 19 or V 7
- Participate in a discussion of A 17, 18, or 19 or V
7
- Post progress report on case study
- Complete by July 21
- Module 8
- Read B 10-11
- Read V 8
- Take a quiz on B 10-11
- Lead a discussion of V 8
- Participate in a discussion of V 8
- Complete by July 25
- Module 9
- Read B 12-13
- Read V 9
- Take a quiz on B 12-13
- Lead a discussion of V 9
- Participate in a discussion of V 9
- Complete by July 29
- Module 10
- Submit electronic copy of final case study report to WebCT
- Complete by August 1
16. The instructor will use the following
rubric to score the final draft of the case study (10 criteria at 5 points
each, 50 points total).
| |
Target (5 pts) |
Acceptable (3 pts) |
Unacceptable (1 pt) |
| Linguistic variables and or markers
TESOL.1 |
Description demonstrates candidate’s ability to
fully understand concepts, principles, theories, and research related
to linguistic variables/markers. |
Description demonstrates candidate’s ability to
understand some concepts, principles, theories, and research related
to linguistic variables/markers. |
Description fails to demonstrate candidate’s
ability to understand concepts, principles, theories, and research
related to linguistic variables/markers. |
| Cultural variables TESOL.2 |
Description demonstrates candidate’s ability to
fully understand the nature and role of cultures to construct learning
environments. |
Description demonstrates candidate is aware of the
nature and role of cultures to construct learning environments. |
Description fails to demonstrate candidate’s
ability to understand the nature and role of cultures to construct
learning environments. |
| Psycho-sociocultural variables in language
acquisition and or use TESOL.2.a TESOL.2.b |
Description demonstrates candidate’s ability to
analyze socially and psycho-socio-culturally significant linguistic
variables/markers and interpret them. |
Description demonstrates candidate’s ability to
accurately distinguish socially and psycho-socio-culturally
significant linguistic variables/markers. |
Description fails to distinguish socially or
psycho-socio-culturally significant linguistic variables/markers. |
| Literature/ Research Review
TESOL.1 TESOL.2 TESOL.2.a TESOL.2.b |
Description demonstrates that candidate has
reviewed a substantial number of documents related to the case study. |
Description demonstrates that candidate has
reviewed some documents related to the case study. |
Description fails to demonstrate that candidate has
reviewed documents related to the case study. |
| Subject/Context TESOL.1
TESOL.2 TESOL.2.a TESOL.2.b |
Description of the subject and/or place where the
study was conducted is clear and sufficient. |
Description of the subject and/or place where the
study was conducted is somewhat clear, but more information is needed. |
Description fails to describe the subject and/or
place where the study was conducted. |
| Hypotheses TESOL.1 TESOL.2
TESOL.2.a TESOL.2.b |
Hypotheses/research questions of the case are
reasonably and clearly formulated. |
Description contains hypotheses/research questions
of the case, but needs further clarification. |
Hypotheses/research questions of the case are too
vague or missing. |
| Methods TESOL.1 TESOL.2
TESOL.2.a TESOL.2.b |
Description explains clearly how candidate gathered
data from the subject and analyzed them. |
Description partly explain how candidate gathered
data from the subject and analyzed them. |
Description fails to explain how candidate gathered
data from the subject and analyzed them. |
| Findings TESOL.1 TESOL.2
TESOL.2.a TESOL.2.b |
Description for the findings is clear and concise. |
Description for the findings is clear, but could be
truncated to be more concise. |
Description for the findings is missing or unclear. |
| Discussion and Conclusion
TESOL.1 TESOL.2 TESOL.2.a TESOL.2.b |
Description draws significant conclusion,
implications, and recommendations or a personal reflection. |
Description draws general conclusions and provides
some implications and recommendations or a general personal
reflection. |
Description fails to draw conclusion, or lacks
implications and recommendations or a personal reflection. |
| Format and Grammar |
The paper closely follows the MLA/APA format and is
free of grammar and spelling errors. |
The paper follows the MLA/APA format with
infrequent spelling and grammar errors. |
The paper does not follow the MLA/APA format.
Misspellings are frequent. Frequent grammar errors. It is evident that
the paper has not been edited. |
17. INSTRUCTOR: The instructor was born to
Canadian parents in Peoria, Illinois, May, 1960. Born in 1925, his parents told
him stories of Manitoba during the Depression. The instructor listened to
monophonic Beatles records on a portable turntable; watched the Vietnam
War on the nightly news and his three older brothers’ reactions to it;
played hockey on frozen ponds; saw the first Ali vs. Frazier fight live on
European television; delivered papers spreading the news of Watergate (are
there any paperboys left?); kept score in bowling with a pencil; learned
to drive with a stick in a VW Bug and a three-on-the-tree Dodge; attended
his first rock concert at Soldier Field in Chicago (Emerson, Lake, and
Palmer; Foghat; J. Giles, Climax Blues Band) and saw his last a couple of
years ago (Dylan and Haggard); typed college papers on a manual
typewriter; bought his first computer at the age of 30—after completing
his dissertation; and ran off his first class handouts with a ditto
machine. Besides Peoria, the instructor has lived in Vancouver,
British Columbia; Bogotá, Colombia; Geneva, Switzerland; Normal, Illinois;
West Lafayette, Indiana; Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Arkadelphia and Hot
Springs, Arkansas; Valdosta, Georgia; and Riverview, Florida, where he
currently makes a home with his wife and three children born in 1995,
1998, and 2000, as well as two dogs and four cats. There used to be
guinea pigs, but mercifully they died.
BACK
TO TOPOS
|